Critical Radarby SAFETEE

How forecasts are made

How the situation becomes a forecast.

A forecast in the radar is not an opinion but a verifiable statement with a probability and a deadline – sourced down to the reference and measured against reality afterwards.

Analyseteam vor einer Weltkarte (symbolic image, AI-generated)

How is a forecast created in the Critical Radar?

It starts with a verifiable question with a deadline. The editorial team then gathers checked statements from situation, global situation, legislation and key figures, starts from the base rate of comparable cases and adjusts it to the specifics. A reviewer checks and releases it; after the deadline the forecast is evaluated.

As of 21 October 2026 · SAFETEE editorial team

Anatomy of a forecast

Five parts. Nothing left to guess.

Every forecast in the radar has the same structure. This makes it comparable, verifiable – and scoreable after the deadline.

Step 1 · The right question

Ask first, then calculate.

A good forecast answers a question that really matters to operators and companies – and that can later be answered clearly with “happened” or “did not happen”. Questions arise from new developments in the situation and from customer enquiries.

  • Verifiable: event, place and deadline are fixed
  • Relevant: for Germany and our customers’ sectors
  • New developments generate question suggestions, the editorial team chooses
  • Horizons of 3, 6 and 12 months
Who decides
The editorial team.
How you can tell
Every forecast is phrased as a statement with a date.

Step 2 · Gathering the basis

What we know – sourced.

For each question, the editorial team compiles what is sourced: checked statements from the knowledge base, situation entries, the effect of the global situation on Germany, the state of legislation, key figures from energy and grid data and historical comparisons.

  • Only checked statements with a source count
  • Every sentence of the basis gets a footnote
  • The choice of sources is visible and can be changed
  • New research flows back into the knowledge base
Who decides
The editorial team chooses the sources.
How you can tell
Footnotes per sentence in the basis.

Step 3 · Base rate

How often has this happened before?

We never start from gut feeling but from the base rate: how often has a comparable event occurred in comparable cases? Only then do we adjust – up or down, depending on the specifics of the case. Every adjustment is justified.

  • Starting value from history and comparable projects
  • Adjustments named and justified individually
  • Assumptions stated openly
  • Early warning signs show when to recalculate
Who decides
The editorial team.
How you can tell
Base rate and assumptions are part of the basis.

Step 4 · Probability

A number you can read.

At the end there is a percentage. It is not a certainty but a statement about frequency: at 65 % we would expect about six to seven out of ten comparable cases to happen. If the situation changes, the number changes – visible as a trend since the last issue.

  • Below 30 %: unlikely · 30–70 %: open · above 70 %: likely
  • Trend since the last issue in percentage points
  • Never 0 % and never 100 % – otherwise it would not be a forecast
Who decides
The editorial team.
How you can tell
Percentage, deadline and trend on every forecast.

65 % likely

Step 5 · Review and release

Four eyes. One signature.

Before a forecast appears, a named reviewer checks question, basis, base rate and number. He or she can switch sources on and off and immediately sees how this shifts the probability. Only with the release does the forecast become part of the issue.

  • Release only with the “reviewer” role and Microsoft sign-in
  • Sources can be switched individually, effect visible immediately
  • Reasons and time in the log
Who decides
A named reviewer.
How you can tell
Release date on the forecast.
Releasing a forecast on a tablet
Symbolic image, AI-generated

Step 6 · Evaluation and calibration

We measure ourselves. In public.

After the deadline every forecast is scored. What counts is the direction: above 50 % it should happen, below 50 % it should not. Results are published in a table – including the misses. The radar learns from all evaluated forecasts: if we were wrong too often at 70 %, later forecasts become more cautious.

  • Scoring by direction: assessed correctly or not
  • Public table of evaluated forecasts
  • Calibration: lessons flow into the next forecasts
Who decides
The editorial team scores, the table is public.
How you can tell
Status “happened” or “did not happen” with date.

Questions and answers

Frequently asked.

What does a forecast of 65 % mean?

That we consider the event rather likely: out of ten comparable cases we would expect about six to seven to happen. A 65 % forecast can therefore also not happen without having been poorly reasoned. That is why we evaluate across many forecasts.

What is a base rate?

The frequency with which a comparable event occurred in comparable cases – for example how many grid connections in a grid area were completed on time. It is the starting value of every forecast; specifics of the case shift it up or down with reasons.

When is a forecast considered correct?

What counts is the direction: a forecast above 50 % was correct if the event occurred by the deadline; one below 50 % was correct if it did not occur. We do not assign exactly 50 %.

Do forecasts change before the deadline?

Yes, if the situation changes. Each new issue shows the current value and the trend since the last issue in percentage points. The value valid at the time of publication is the one that is scored.

Can I get forecasts for my project?

Yes. With the packages for companies, SAFETEE sets up research for your sector, project type and region and creates forecasts on the questions that affect your project – with reports and a fixed contact. Enquiries to radar@safetee.eu.

Next

Your project. Your forecasts.

Questions about the radar: radar@safetee.eu